Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715860›Full record

ReviewAnalytical science advances2021

A conversation between hyphenated spectroscopic techniques and phytometabolites from medicinal plants.

Shivani Puri, Dinkar Sahal, Upendra Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Editorial for special issue: Metabolomics in India.Analytical science advances · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shivani PuriChemical Technology Division CSIR-IHBT Palampur Himachal Pradesh 176061 India.
Dinkar SahalMalaria Drug Discovery Research Group International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology New Delhi 110067 India.
Upendra SharmaChemical Technology Division CSIR-IHBT Palampur Himachal Pradesh 176061 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7693-8690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicinal plant metabolomics has emerged as a goldmine for the natural product chemists. It provides a pool of bioactive phytoconstituents leading to accelerated novel discoveries and the elucidation of a variety of biosynthetic pathways. Further, it also acts as an innovative tool for herbal medicine's scientific validation and quality assurance. This review highlights different strategies and analytical techniques employed in the practice of metabolomics. Further, it also discusses several other applications and advantages of metabolomics in the area of natural product chemistry. Additional examples of integrating metabolomics with multivariate data analysis techniques for some Indian medicinal plants are also reviewed. Recent technical advances in mass spectrometry-based hyphenated techniques, nuclear magnetic resonance-based techniques, and comprehensive hyphenated technologies for phytometabolite profiling studies have also been reviewed. Mass Spectral Imaging (MSI) has been presented as a highly promising method for high precision in situ spatiotemporal monitoring of phytometabolites. We conclude by introducing GNPS (Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking) as an emerging platform to make social networks of related molecules, to explore data and to annotate more metabolites, and expand the networks to novel "predictive" metabolites that can be validated.

Indexed as

herbal medicinehyphenated techniquesmultivariate data analysisphytometabolite profilingplant metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID38715860
PMCPMC10989556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.