Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715720›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2024

Intraspecific Variation in the Placement of Campaniform Sensilla on the Wings of the Hawkmoth

K E Stanchak, T Deora, A I Weber, M K Hickner, A Moalin, L Abdalla, T L Daniel, B W Brunton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Noses on the wing: the olfactory capacity of hawkmoth wings.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K E StanchakUniversity of Washington, Department of Biology, Seattle 98195, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1405-1143
T DeoraDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, Delhi-NCR 201314, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-2882
A I WeberUniversity of Washington, Department of Biology, Seattle 98195, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0533-5876
M K HicknerUniversity of Washington, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seattle 98195, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1880-7286
A MoalinUniversity of Washington, Department of Biology, Seattle 98195, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7131-4269
L AbdallaUniversity of Washington, Department of Biology, Seattle 98195, WA.
T L DanielUniversity of Washington, Department of Biology, Seattle 98195, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-1096
B W BruntonUniversity of Washington, Department of Biology, Seattle 98195, WA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-3466

Funding

University of Washington ENDURER25NS114097 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHUDLER, ERIC H, DE LA IGLESIA, HORACIO O · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS114097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flight control requires active sensory feedback, and insects have many sensors that help them estimate their current locomotor state, including campaniform sensilla (CS), which are mechanoreceptors that sense strain resulting from deformation of the cuticle. CS on the wing detect bending and torsional forces encountered during flight, providing input to the flight feedback control system. During flight, wings experience complex spatio-temporal strain patterns. Because CS detect only local strain, their placement on the wing is presumably critical for determining the overall representation of wing deformation; however, how these sensilla are distributed across wings is largely unknown. Here, we test the hypothesis that CS are found in stereotyped locations across individuals of

Identifiers

PMID38715720
PMCPMC11074993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.