ArticleSolar energy (Phoenix, Ariz.)2024
Impact of Additive Manufacturing Materials on Thermal Performance of Silicon Reference Cells.
Article in Solar energy (Phoenix, Ariz.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, is quickly becoming a widespread manufacturing method offering timely and cost-effective build times for unique part geometries with an increasing range of material offerings. One unique use for additive manufacturing is constructing the housing for reference solar cells, which are crucial instruments for evaluating the electrical performance of photovoltaic solar cells and modules. These instruments, which require good thermal conduction, are costly to manufacture because they are usually machined from aluminum using precision milling machines. In this work, we set out to evaluate several presently available additive manufacturing materials for their thermal properties when used to house reference solar cells. We fabricated several types of reference cell instruments with a tabletop, filament-based 3D printer using polylactic acid (PLA) and composite PLA/metal materials with different infill percentages. Furthermore, we fabricated several all-metal 3D printed reference cells using a binder jet printed stainless steel-bronze material blend and compared the thermal properties of all 3D printed instruments against a standard aluminum housing reference cell. Measurements included temperature monitoring of an embedded thermocouple sensor on an isothermal plate under the ambient environment and when exposed to high irradiation under a solar simulator. Current vs voltage measurements were also taken under the solar simulator and the open circuit voltage results were used to verify the actual silicon cell temperature. Our findings indicate that the stainless steel-bronze option can function well as an alternative to traditional aluminum-based housings, while the lower-cost metal-PLA composite can only be used under indoor light spectra or when used in a flash-type solar simulator when the instrument is not exposed to excessive radiation and heat.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.