ArticleAI (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Audio-Based Emotion Recognition Using Self-Supervised Learning on an Engineered Feature Space.
Article in AI (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalization of AI Using Personal Foundation Models Can Lead to More Precise Digital Therapeutics.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Personalized AI-Driven Real-Time Models to Predict Stress-Induced Blood Pressure Spikes Using Wearable Devices: Proposal for a Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotion recognition models using audio input data can enable the development of interactive systems with applications in mental healthcare, marketing, gaming, and social media analysis. While the field of affective computing using audio data is rich, a major barrier to achieve consistently high-performance models is the paucity of available training labels. Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a family of methods which can learn despite a scarcity of supervised labels by predicting properties of the data itself. To understand the utility of self-supervised learning for audio-based emotion recognition, we have applied self-supervised learning pre-training to the classification of emotions from the CMU Multimodal Opinion Sentiment and Emotion Intensity (CMU- MOSEI)'s acoustic data. Unlike prior papers that have experimented with raw acoustic data, our technique has been applied to encoded acoustic data with 74 parameters of distinctive audio features at discrete timesteps. Our model is first pre-trained to uncover the randomly masked timestamps of the acoustic data. The pre-trained model is then fine-tuned using a small sample of annotated data. The performance of the final model is then evaluated via overall mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute error (MAE) per emotion, overall four-class accuracy, and four-class accuracy per emotion. These metrics are compared against a baseline deep learning model with an identical backbone architecture. We find that self-supervised learning consistently improves the performance of the model across all metrics, especially when the number of annotated data points in the fine-tuning step is small. Furthermore, we quantify the behaviors of the self-supervised model and its convergence as the amount of annotated data increases. This work characterizes the utility of self-supervised learning for affective computing, demonstrating that self-supervised learning is most useful when the number of training examples is small and that the effect is most pronounced for emotions which are easier to classify such as happy, sad, and angry. This work further demonstrates that self-supervised learning still improves performance when applied to the embedded feature representations rather than the traditional approach of pre-training on the raw input space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.