Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715562›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine research2024

The Utility of Echocardiography in Estimating Fluid Responsiveness.

Nnedindu Asogwa, Marc Assaad, Joanne Ling, Gennifer Wahbah Makhoul, Halim El Hage

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nnedindu AsogwaDepartment of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA.
Marc AssaadDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Carilion Clinic Virginia Tech School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24014, USA.
Joanne LingDepartment of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA.
Gennifer Wahbah MakhoulDepartment of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA.
Halim El HageDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the volume status in critically ill patients is the key to maintain the stability of the hemodynamics; however, it can be challenging to view the complexity of cases and the diversity of shock etiology. Multiple noninvasive means have been used to study the effectiveness of volume resuscitation, but none of them have been used as gold standard. We aim to illustrate the most used techniques: left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral versus inferior vena cava compressibility index, and highlight their limitations and strengths. These tools are both operator-dependent and might be affected by several factors including ventilator settings.

Indexed as

Cardiac outputEchocardiographyFluid responsivenessInferior vena cavaLeft ventricular outflow tractStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID38715562
PMCPMC11073387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.