Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715473›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2024

Implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting.

Oddrún Danielsen, Claus Varnum, Christian Bredgaard Jensen, Thomas Jakobsen, Mikkel Rathsach Andersen, Manuel Josef Bieder, Søren Overgaard, Christoffer Calov Jørgensen, Henrik Kehlet, Kirill Gromov and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oddrún DanielsenCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg. oddrun.danielsen@rsyd.dk.
Claus VarnumCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital - Vejle.
Christian Bredgaard JensenCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hvidovre University Hospital.
Thomas JakobsenCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital.
Mikkel Rathsach AndersenCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte.
Manuel Josef BiederDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Næstved, Slagelse and Ringsted Hospitals.
Søren OvergaardCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg.
Christoffer Calov JørgensenCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital of Northern Zealand, Hillerød.
Henrik KehletCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Kirill GromovCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hvidovre University Hospital.
Martin Lindberg-LarsenCenter for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital and Svendborg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLength of hospital stay after hip and knee arthroplasty is about 1 day in Denmark with few patients discharged on the day of surgery. Hence, a protocol for multicenter implementation of discharge on day of surgery has been instituted. We aimed to describe the implementation of outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in a multicenter public healthcare setting.

methodsWe performed a prospective multicenter study from 7 public hospitals across Denmark. Patients were screened using well-defined in- and exclusion criteria and were discharged on day of surgery when fulfilling functional discharge criteria. The study period was from September 2022 to February 2023 with variable start of implementation. Data from the same centers in a 6-month period before the COVID pandemic from July 2019 to December 2019 was used for baseline control.

resultsOf 2,756 primary hip and knee arthroplasties, 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-39) were eligible (range 21-50% in centers) and 52% (range 24-62%) of these were discharged on day of surgery. 21% (CI 20-23) of all patients (eligible and non-eligible) were discharged on day of surgery with a range of 10-31% within centers. This was an additional 15% (CI 13-17, P < 0.001) compared with patients discharged in the control period (6% in 2019).

conclusionWe found it possible to perform outpatient hip and knee replacement in 21% of patients in a public healthcare setting, probably to be increased with further center experience.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresCOVID-19DenmarkFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38715473
PMCPMC11077343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.