ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Reconstruction of the real 3D shape of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The photographs of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus taken by electron transmission microscopy and cryoelectron microscopy provide only a 2D silhouette. The viruses appear to look like distorted circles. The present paper questions the real shape of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and makes an attempt to give an answer. Is this a general ellipsoid, a spheroid with rotational symmetry, a sphere, or something else? The answer requires the application of tools from three different disciplines: structural mechanics, microbiology, and statistics. A total of 590 virus photographs taken from 22 recently published papers were examined. From this experimental data pool, the histogram of diameter ratios was built from the 283 measurements where the virus images could be approximated as ellipses. The curve peaks at the diameter ratio of 1.22. The transformation equation for the spatial shape to the planar shade was derived for a fixed light source of the microscope. This equation involves an unknown orientation of the viruses with respect to the microscope. Two sets of models were developed, one with a uniform distribution of the virus orientation and the other with the orientation defined by the normalized beta distribution. In both sets of models, the unknown diameter ratio of the spheroidal virus was regarded as a random realization from translated gamma distributions. The parameters of the distribution of the kernel functions were determined by minimizing the mean square difference between the predicted and measured 2D histograms. The information included in the measured histograms was found to be insufficient to find an unknown distribution of the virus's orientation. Simply too many unknown parameters render the solution physically unrealistic. The minimization procedure with a uniform probability of virus orientation predicted the peak of the aspect ratio of the 3D spheroid at 1.32. Based on this result, models of the virus will be developed in the continuation of this research for a full dynamic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.