Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715358›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

Spectral neural approximations for models of transcriptional dynamics.

Gennady Gorin, Maria Carilli, Tara Chari, Lior Pachter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gennady GorinDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
Maria CarilliDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
Tara ChariDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
Lior PachterDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Electronic address: lpachter@caltech.edu.

Funding

Generation of novel cell type specific mouse genetic toolsU19MH114830 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2017 to 2021
$64.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of high-throughput transcriptomics provides an opportunity to advance mechanistic understanding of transcriptional processes and their connections to cellular function at an unprecedented, genome-wide scale. These transcriptional systems, which involve discrete stochastic events, are naturally modeled using chemical master equations (CMEs), which can be solved for probability distributions to fit biophysical rates that govern system dynamics. While CME models have been used as standards in fluorescence transcriptomics for decades to analyze single-species RNA distributions, there are often no closed-form solutions to CMEs that model multiple species, such as nascent and mature RNA transcript counts. This has prevented the application of standard likelihood-based statistical methods for analyzing high-throughput, multi-species transcriptomic datasets using biophysical models. Inspired by recent work in machine learning to learn solutions to complex dynamical systems, we leverage neural networks and statistical understanding of system distributions to produce accurate approximations to a steady-state bivariate distribution for a model of the RNA life cycle that includes nascent and mature molecules. The steady-state distribution to this simple model has no closed-form solution and requires intensive numerical solving techniques: our approach reduces likelihood evaluation time by several orders of magnitude. We demonstrate two approaches, whereby solutions are approximated by 1) learning the weights of kernel distributions with constrained parameters or 2) learning both weights and scaling factors for parameters of kernel distributions. We show that our strategies, denoted by kernel weight regression and parameter-scaled kernel weight regression, respectively, enable broad exploration of parameter space and can be used in existing likelihood frameworks to infer transcriptional burst sizes, RNA splicing rates, and mRNA degradation rates from experimental transcriptomic data.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticModels, GeneticNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38715358
PMCPMC11393700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.