ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Spectral neural approximations for models of transcriptional dynamics.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Monod: model-based discovery and integration through fitting stochastic transcriptional dynamics to single-cell sequencing data.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Incorporating spatial diffusion into models of bursty stochastic transcription.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Empirical methods that provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes.Biophysical journal · 2025Review
- Machine learning tools advance biophysics.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- New and notable: Revisiting the "two cultures" through extrinsic noise.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Transcriptional bursting dynamics in gene expression.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Review
- Studying stochastic systems biology of the cell with single-cell genomics data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Biophysical modeling with variational autoencoders for bimodal, single-cell RNA sequencing data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of high-throughput transcriptomics provides an opportunity to advance mechanistic understanding of transcriptional processes and their connections to cellular function at an unprecedented, genome-wide scale. These transcriptional systems, which involve discrete stochastic events, are naturally modeled using chemical master equations (CMEs), which can be solved for probability distributions to fit biophysical rates that govern system dynamics. While CME models have been used as standards in fluorescence transcriptomics for decades to analyze single-species RNA distributions, there are often no closed-form solutions to CMEs that model multiple species, such as nascent and mature RNA transcript counts. This has prevented the application of standard likelihood-based statistical methods for analyzing high-throughput, multi-species transcriptomic datasets using biophysical models. Inspired by recent work in machine learning to learn solutions to complex dynamical systems, we leverage neural networks and statistical understanding of system distributions to produce accurate approximations to a steady-state bivariate distribution for a model of the RNA life cycle that includes nascent and mature molecules. The steady-state distribution to this simple model has no closed-form solution and requires intensive numerical solving techniques: our approach reduces likelihood evaluation time by several orders of magnitude. We demonstrate two approaches, whereby solutions are approximated by 1) learning the weights of kernel distributions with constrained parameters or 2) learning both weights and scaling factors for parameters of kernel distributions. We show that our strategies, denoted by kernel weight regression and parameter-scaled kernel weight regression, respectively, enable broad exploration of parameter space and can be used in existing likelihood frameworks to infer transcriptional burst sizes, RNA splicing rates, and mRNA degradation rates from experimental transcriptomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.