Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715124›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2024

Coping strategies, resilience and quality of life: reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic among Romanian physicians.

Cătălina Angela Crișan, Răzvan Pop, Roland Stretea, Zaki Milhem, Alina-Ioana Forray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cătălina Angela CrișanDepartment of Neurosciences, Discipline of Psychiatry and Pediatric Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Răzvan PopClinical Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 400347, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. razvan9116@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-178X
Roland StreteaDepartment of Neurosciences, Discipline of Psychiatry and Pediatric Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Zaki MilhemDepartment of Neurosciences, Discipline of Psychiatry and Pediatric Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alina-Ioana ForrayDepartment of Community Medicine, Discipline of Public Health and Management, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has presented multiple psychological challenges for healthcare workers, such as anxiety, depression, burnout, and substance use disorders. In this research, we investigate the different ways Romanian physicians dealt with the difficult period of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also analyze how positive and negative stress-reducing strategies, as well as demographic variables, affect their psychological resilience and quality of life. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of how physicians coped with the unprecedented global health challenges.

methodsWe carried out a national cross-sectional study of 265 physicians in Romania between January 2021 and January 2022 using a web-based questionnaire. The study employed a web-based questionnaire to assess coping mechanisms using the COPE inventory, resilience through the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC 25), and quality of life via the WHOQOL-BREF scale. The COPE inventory, consisting of 60 items across 15 subscales, categorizes coping strategies into problem-focused, emotion-focused, and dysfunctional types, with each item rated on a 4-point scale. The CD-RISC 25 measures resilience on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100. WHOQOL-BREF assesses quality of life through 26 items in 4 domains: physical, mental, social relations, and environmental, scored from 1 to 5 and converted to a 0-100 scale for domain scores. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were employed to discern the intricate relationships between coping strategies, resilience levels, quality of life dimensions, and pertinent demographic factors.

resultsThe average CD-RISC score among participants was 66.2. The mean scores for the values for the QOL subscales were 64.0 for physical well-being, 61.7 for psychological well-being, 61.2 for social relationships, and 64.7 for environment. Individuals tend to use problem-focused and emotion-focused coping more than dysfunctional mechanisms, according to the COPE inventory. Problem-focused and emotion-focused coping are positively correlated with resilience, while dysfunctional coping is negatively correlated. Resilience is significantly influenced by gender and professional status, with males and senior specialists reporting higher levels while younger physicians and residents reporting lower levels.

conclusionsOur data points to specific protective characteristics and some detrimental factors on physicians' resilience and quality of life during the pandemic.

Indexed as

Coping SkillsCOVID-19PhysiciansQuality of LifeResilience, PsychologicalAdultBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRomaniaSurveys and QuestionnairesCoping behaviorCOVID-19Cross-sectional studiesHealth behaviorMental healthPhysiciansPsychological stressQuality of lifeResilience

Identifiers

PMID38715124
PMCPMC11075254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.