ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024
Superiority of
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Path beyond the blind end-unravel the imaging spectrum of appendiceal pathologies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Rare Appendicular Pathologies: Diagnostic Challenges, Surgical Management, and Outcomes in a Retrospective Tertiary-Center Cohort with Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of FAPI PET on staging and management in patients with digestive system tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma synchronous with ascending colon adenocarcinoma and severe anemia: A case report.Medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the present study, we investigated the value of
methodsThis single-center retrospective clinical study, including 16 untreated and 6 treated patients, was performed from January 2022 to May 2023 at Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital. Histopathologic examination and imaging follow-up served as the reference standard.
resultsThe accurate detection of primary tumors and peritoneal metastases were improved from 28.6% (4/14) and 50% (8/16) for CE-CT, and 43.8% (7/16) and 85.0% (17/20) for
conclusionsThe present study revealed that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.