Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715040›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Critical care outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis: a United States national inpatient sample cross-sectional study.

Spencer R Goble, Abdellatif S Ismail, Jose D Debes, Thomas M Leventhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [When should a liver disease patient be admitted to the intensive care unit?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  6. [Bleeding in liver diseases].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Spencer R GobleDepartment of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 730 South 8th Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA. Spencer.Goble@hcmed.org.
Abdellatif S IsmailDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus, 827 Linden Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Jose D DebesDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Mayo Memorial Building, MMC 250, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Thomas M LeventhalDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior assessments of critical care outcomes in patients with cirrhosis have shown conflicting results. We aimed to provide nationwide generalizable results of critical care outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

methodsThis is a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Adults with cirrhosis who required respiratory intubation, central venous catheter placement or both (n = 12,945) with principal diagnoses including: esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH, 24%), hepatic encephalopathy (58%), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS, 14%) or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (4%) were included. A comparison cohort of patients without cirrhosis requiring intubation or central line placement for any principal diagnosis was included.

resultsThose with cirrhosis were younger (mean 58 vs. 63 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (62% vs. 54%, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in the cirrhosis cohort (33.1% vs. 26.6%, p < 0.001) and ranged from 26.7% in EVH to 50.6% HRS. Mortality when renal replacement therapy was utilized (n = 1580, 12.2%) was 46.5% in the cirrhosis cohort, compared to 32.3% in other hospitalizations (p < 0.001), and was lowest in EVH (25.7%) and highest in HRS (51.5%). Mortality when cardiopulmonary resuscitation was used was increased in the cirrhosis cohort (88.0% vs. 72.1%, p < 0.001) and highest in HRS (95.7%).

conclusionsOne-third of patients with cirrhosis requiring critical care did not survive to discharge in this U.S. nationwide assessment. While outcomes were worse than in patients without cirrhosis, the results do suggest better outcomes compared to previous studies.

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisAdultAgedCritical Care OutcomesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesIntensive care unitsPalliative carePatient care planning

Identifiers

PMID38715040
PMCPMC11077702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.