Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38715022›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

The impact of the Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR) framework on students' resilience, anxiety, depression, burnout, and academic-related stress: a quasi-experimental study.

Majed Wadi, Ali Shorbagi, Sarra Shorbagi, Mohamed Hassan Taha, Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majed WadiMedical Education Department, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia. m.wadi@qu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-770X
Ali ShorbagiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. ashorbagi@sharjah.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-0281
Sarra ShorbagiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine and Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-2904
Mohamed Hassan TahaCollege of Medicine and Medical Education Center, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-5590
Muhamad Saiful Bahri YusoffMedical Education Department, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4969-9217

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS: 203.PPSP.6171219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical students face significant psychological stress, impacting their academic performance and well-being. The Systematic Assessment for Resilience (SAR) framework is designed to enhance resilience and mitigate stress among medical students, addressing the need for interventions within the assessment system in medical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of SAR framework on medical students' resilience, anxiety, depression, burnout, and academic stress.

methodsThis study employed a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-testing. It involved the training of course coordinators in implementing the SAR framework and its integration into the daily learning activities. Fourth-year medical students were assessed before and after the intervention using standardized measures of resilience, anxiety, depression, burnout, and academic stress. Data were analyzed using quantitative methods and thematic analysis for qualitative feedback.

resultsPost-intervention, students demonstrated a significant increase in resilience scores (p < 0.001) and a notable decrease in measures of anxiety, depression, and academic stress (p < 0.001). The burnout types were also statistically different (p < 0.001) except client-related burnout (p > 0.05). Qualitative feedback of the course coordinators highlighted an improved learning environment, increased coping strategies, and a more supportive academic culture.

conclusionThe SAR framework significantly contributes to enhancing medical students' resilience and reducing psychological distress. Its implementation suggests a promising approach to fostering a supportive educational environment that not only addresses the psychological challenges faced by medical students but also enhances their academic performance and overall well-being. Further research is warranted to explore the long-term impacts of SAR across different medical education contexts.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionResilience, PsychologicalStudents, MedicalAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultBurnout, ProfessionalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultAnxietyAssessmentBurnoutDepressionMedical EducationMedical studentsResilienceStress

Identifiers

PMID38715022
PMCPMC11077819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.