Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38714998›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

The role of healthcare providers and caregivers in monitoring critically ill children: a qualitative study in a tertiary hospital, southern Malawi.

Daniel Mwale, Lucinda Manda-Taylor, Josephine Langton, Alice Likumbo, Michael Boele van Hensbroek, IMPALA Study team, Job Calis, Wendy Janssens, Christopher Pell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of IMPALA 2.0: Addressing Patient Monitoring in Low-Resource Hospitals in Malawi.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel MwaleKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi. dmwale@kuhes.ac.mw.
Lucinda Manda-TaylorKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Josephine LangtonKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Alice LikumboTraining Research Unit of Excellence, Blantyre, Malawi.
Michael Boele van HensbroekDepartment of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef, NL, the Netherlands.
IMPALA Study team
Job CalisDepartment of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef, NL, the Netherlands.
Wendy JanssensAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christopher PellAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership RIA20201-3294 - IMPALA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill children require close monitoring to facilitate timely interventions throughout their hospitalisation. In low- and middle-income countries with a high disease burden, scarce paediatric critical care resources complicates effective monitoring. This study describes the monitoring practices for critically ill children in a paediatric high-dependency unit (HDU) in Malawi and examines factors affecting this vital process.

methodsA formative qualitative study based on 21 in-depth interviews of healthcare providers (n = 12) and caregivers of critically ill children (n = 9) in the HDU along with structured observations of the monitoring process. Interviews were transcribed and translated for thematic content analysis.

resultsThe monitoring of critically ill children admitted to the HDU was intermittent, using devices and through clinical observations. Healthcare providers prioritised the most critically ill children for more frequent monitoring. The ward layout, power outages, lack of human resources and limited familiarity with available monitoring devices, affected monitoring. Caregivers, who were present throughout admission, were involved informally in monitoring and flagging possible deterioration of their child to the healthcare staff.

conclusionBarriers to the monitoring of critically ill children in the HDU were related to ward layout and infrastructure, availability of accurate monitoring devices and limited human resources. Potential interventions include training healthcare providers to prioritise the most critically ill children, allocate and effectively employ available devices, and supporting caregivers to play a more formal role in escalation.

Indexed as

CaregiversCritical IllnessHealth PersonnelQualitative ResearchTertiary Care CentersAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricInterviews as TopicMalawiMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicMalawiMonitoringPaediatric critical careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38714998
PMCPMC11077805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.