ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Optical imaging (HandScan) can identify ultrasound remission in rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing disease activity in inflammatory arthritis using optical spectral transmission: a systematic review compared to joint ultrasound, MRI, and clinical activity markers.BMC rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Ultrasound- and clinical-defined disease activities are associated with altered bone microarchitecture and lower bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying remission is of high importance in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because remission is associated with less structural progression. We investigated the efficacy of a new optical imaging device, HandScan, to identify RA remission, as defined by ultrasound (US).
methods61 RA patients were included. Disease activity was evaluated by clinical assessment and US, using gray-scale (GS) and Power Doppler (PD). HandScan determined unitary optical spectral transmission (OST) values for wrists, metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. At the patient level, three composite HandScan (HS) scores were calculated: total HS score; disease activity score OST (DAS-OST) and DAS-OST without patient global assessment (PtGA). Using ROC curves, we determined HS cut-offs to identify US-defined remission.
resultsAt the joint level, unitary OST values significantly correlated with GS synovitis [odds ratio (OR) 2.43, p < 0.0001] and PD positivity (OR 3.72, p = 0.0002 ). At the patient level, total HS score and DAS-OST were significantly associated with all gray-scale US (GSUS) and power doppler US (PDUS) parameters evaluated (synovitis number and grade, synovial thickness, PD grade) (p < 0.05). The cut-off to identify US-defined remission at the joint level was of 0.92, giving an 81% sensitivity and a 96% positive predictive value (PPV). At the patient level, ROC-curves failed to identify a robust cut-off for the total HS score, but did identify a cut-off (3.68) for DAS-OST to identify US-defined remission, but with lower sensitivity (75%), specificity (56%) and PPV (67%).
conclusionsHandScan is a non-invasive optical imaging technique providing OST values that correlate with GSUS and PDUS parameters. In addition, HandScan is able to reliably identify US-defined remission in RA at the joint level, with a good sensitivity and high PPV. At the patient level, HandScan DAS-OST can also determine US remission (while total HS score failed to do so), but with lower performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.