ArticleBMC medical education2024
Gender differences in learning and study strategies impact medical students' preclinical and USMLE step 1 examination performance.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Tolerance of uncertainty and reflection ability among medical students in Germany.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Data driven student support: utilize the LASSI to improve academic performance.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Abuse and empowerment in the academic field on the academic performance of medical students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Learning Style Profiles of Second-Year MBBS Students in a Medical College Situated in Remote Islands of India.Cureus · 2025Article
- How does gender influence student learning, stress and career choice in endodontics?International endodontic journal · 2025Review
- Learning motivation among international students: the role of demographic factors.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Exploring motivational and contextual factors influencing medical career choice: a theory-informed study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Predictive Validity of Pre-Clinical Academic Achievements in Comprehensive Basic Science Examination: A Nationwide Cohort of Iranian Medical Students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of english academic papers by non-native english-speaking medical students - the educational application of ChatGPT.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Disparities Impacts Psychiatry Competency Assessments among Students in a Nigerian Medical School.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation of students' learning strategies can enhance academic support. Few studies have investigated differences in learning strategies between male and female students as well as their impact on United States Medical Licensing Examination® (USMLE) Step 1 and preclinical performance.
methodsThe Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) was administered to the classes of 2019-2024 (female (n = 350) and male (n = 262)). Students' performance on preclinical first-year (M1) courses, preclinical second-year (M2) courses, and USMLE Step 1 was recorded. An independent t-test evaluated differences between females and males on each LASSI scale. A Pearson product moment correlation determined which LASSI scales correlated with preclinical performance and USMLE Step 1 examinations.
resultsOf the 10 LASSI scales, Anxiety, Attention, Information Processing, Selecting Main Idea, Test Strategies and Using Academic Resources showed significant differences between genders. Females reported higher levels of Anxiety (p < 0.001), which significantly influenced their performance. While males and females scored similarly in Concentration, Motivation, and Time Management, these scales were significant predictors of performance variation in females. Test Strategies was the largest contributor to performance variation for all students, regardless of gender.
conclusionGender differences in learning influence performance on STEP1. Consideration of this study's results will allow for targeted interventions for academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.