ArticleBMC surgery2024
Microsurgical treatment of ophthalmic artery aneurysm, a case series of 55 patients with long-term follow-up.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOphthalmic artery aneurysm (OAA) can be secured in endovascular or microsurgical approaches. Still there are controversies in technique selection and their long term outcomes.
methodsAll the patients with OAA were treated microsurgically and followed. Demographic data, neurological status, physical examination findings, angiographic data, operation details, and intraoperative and postoperative events were recorded and analyzed. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsAmong 55 patients, 38 were females (69.1%). Median preoperative glasgow coma scale (GCS), Fisher Grade, and Hunt and Hess(HH) scores were 15, 1 and 1, respectively. The most common neurologic manifestation was visual problems (n = 15). The most common anatomical projection was medial (43.6%) oriented lesions. 85.5% of them only had 1 ophthalmic aneurysm while multiple aneurysms were reported in 14.6%. In 52 patients temporary clip was used. in 21 patients (38.2%) intraoperative aneurysm rupture occurred. Larger aneurysm size and preoperative hydrocephalus were associated with higher rates of aneurysm rupture (P = 0.003 and 0.031). 28.5% of the patients with visual problems had clinical improvement in the postoperative period. The mean follow-up period was 5 years. Follow-up angiography showed a 100% obliteration rate with a 0.0% recurrence rate. Median values for follow-up glasgow outcome scale and modified Rankin scale were 5 and 0, respectively. favorable neurological outcomes were associated with better primary GCS and HH scores.
conclusionOAA microsurgery is an effective and safe procedure with significant improvement in both visual and neurological status. Low recurrence rate and excellent clinical recovery are the most important advantages of microsurgery in OAA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.