ReviewBMC medical research methodology2024
Using Bayesian statistics in confirmatory clinical trials in the regulatory setting: a tutorial review.
Review in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian clinical trials was underused and poorly reported: a systematic survey.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Pooled it
- Digital N-of-1 trials and their application in experimental physiology.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- The design of a small Bayesian hybrid-controlled trial utilizing time-to-event data from six published sources that used best alternative care to treat liver-predominant metastasis from primary ocular melanoma.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- BIRTH: Bayesian integration of real-world data for trials with hybrid arms.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Bayesian Response-Adaptive Randomization for Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Bayesian neural ordinary differential equations framework to study the effects of chemical mixtures on survival.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Multicentre study on nirsevimab: Bayesian analysis reveals persisting risk for preterm infants.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- AI-driven biomarker discovery: enhancing precision in cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Characteristics of pediatric interventional drug trials registered between 2015 and 2024 on ClinicalTrials.gov.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bayesian statistics plays a pivotal role in advancing medical science by enabling healthcare companies, regulators, and stakeholders to assess the safety and efficacy of new treatments, interventions, and medical procedures. The Bayesian framework offers a unique advantage over the classical framework, especially when incorporating prior information into a new trial with quality external data, such as historical data or another source of co-data. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in regulatory submissions using Bayesian statistics due to its flexibility and ability to provide valuable insights for decision-making, addressing the modern complexity of clinical trials where frequentist trials are inadequate. For regulatory submissions, companies often need to consider the frequentist operating characteristics of the Bayesian analysis strategy, regardless of the design complexity. In particular, the focus is on the frequentist type I error rate and power for all realistic alternatives. This tutorial review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of Bayesian statistics in sample size determination, control of type I error rate, multiplicity adjustments, external data borrowing, etc., in the regulatory environment of clinical trials. Fundamental concepts of Bayesian sample size determination and illustrative examples are provided to serve as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and statisticians seeking to develop more complex and innovative designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.