ArticleLeukemia2024
Predicting survival in patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis.
Article in Leukemia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms have higher rates of relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation compared to those with MDS: A Brazilian SBTMO/CIBMTR registry analysis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Molecular and therapeutic frontiers in anemia therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- [Clinical and molecular characteristics of myeloproliferative neoplasms patients with NFE2 gene mutations].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Mutational Spectrum and Clinical Outcomes of Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single-Institution Study in Korea with Emphasis onJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: a practical guide to diagnosis and management.Leukemia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated data from 180 consecutive patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-SF3B1-T) who were diagnosed according to the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms to identify covariates associated with survival. At a median follow-up of 48 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-61 months), the median survival was 69 months (95% CI 59-79 months). Patients with bone marrow ring sideroblasts (RS) < 15% had shorter median overall survival (OS) than did those with bone marrow RS ≥ 15% (41 months [95% CI 32-50 months] versus 76 months [95% CI 59-93 months]; P < 0.001). According to the univariable analyses of OS, age ≥ 65 years (P < 0.001), hemoglobin concentration (Hb) < 80 g/L (P = 0.090), platelet count (PLT) ≥ 800 × 10E + 9/L (P = 0.087), bone marrow RS < 15% (P < 0.001), the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) cytogenetic category intermediate/poor/very poor (P = 0.005), SETBP1 mutation (P = 0.061) and SRSF2 mutation (P < 0.001) were associated with poor survival. Based on variables selected from univariable analyses, two separate survival prediction models, a clinical survival model, and a clinical-molecular survival model, were developed using multivariable analyses with the minimum value of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to specifically predict outcomes in patients with MDS/MPN-SF3B1-T according to the 2022 WHO classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.