ArticleScientific reports2024
Precise and automated lung cancer cell classification using deep neural network with multiscale features and model distillation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified ShuffleNet trained on gradient pattern and shape-based features for lung cancer classification with improved M-SegNet segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of lightweight CNN architectures for reliable multi-class classification of lung cancer using histopathological imaging techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-omics driven computational framework for cancer molecular subtype classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dynamic-Attentive Pooling Networks: A Hybrid Lightweight Deep Model for Lung Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- A Holistic Approach to Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- XLLC-Net: A lightweight and explainable CNN for accurate lung cancer classification using histopathological images.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Novel Hybrid Model for Automatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Classification Using Histopathological Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung diseases globally impose a significant pathological burden and mortality rate, particularly the differential diagnosis between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell lung carcinoma, which is paramount in determining optimal treatment strategies and improving clinical prognoses. Faced with the challenge of improving diagnostic precision and stability, this study has developed an innovative deep learning-based model. This model employs a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) and Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) modules combined with a Residual Network (ResNet18), to enhance the processing capabilities for complex images and conduct multi-scale analysis of each channel's importance in classifying lung cancer. Moreover, the performance of the model is further enhanced by employing knowledge distillation from larger teacher models to more compact student models. Subjected to rigorous five-fold cross-validation, our model outperforms existing models on all performance metrics, exhibiting exceptional diagnostic accuracy. Ablation studies on various model components have verified that each addition effectively improves model performance, achieving an average accuracy of 98.84% and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 98.83%. Collectively, the results indicate that our model significantly improves the accuracy of disease diagnosis, providing physicians with more precise clinical decision-making support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.