Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38714827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Effects of auditory noise intensity and color on the dynamics of upright stance.

Sam Carey, Jessica M Ross, Drew Abney, Ramesh Balasubramaniam

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sam CareyCognitive & Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, 5200 N Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA. scarey5@ucmerced.edu.
Jessica M RossVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Drew AbneyDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Ramesh BalasubramaniamCognitive & Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, 5200 N Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work assessing the effect of additive noise on the postural control system has found a positive effect of additive white noise on postural dynamics. This study covers two separate experiments that were run sequentially to better understand how the structure of the additive noise signal affects postural dynamics, while also furthering our knowledge of how the intensity of auditory stimulation of noise may elicit this phenomenon. Across the two experiments, we introduced three auditory noise stimulations of varying structure (white, pink, and brown noise). Experiment 1 presented the stimuli at 35 dB while Experiment 2 was presented at 75 dB. Our findings demonstrate a decrease in variability of the postural control system regardless of the structure of the noise signal presented, but only for high intensity auditory stimulation.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationNoiseAdultColorFemaleHumansMalePostural BalancePostureStanding PositionYoung AdultAuditory feedbackBrown noiseIntensityPink noisePostural swayWhite noise

Identifiers

PMID38714827
PMCPMC11076473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.