ArticleScientific reports2024
Orbital learning: a novel, actively orchestrated decentralised learning for healthcare.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and ECG: A New Frontier in Cardiac Diagnostics and Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Swarm learning network for privacy-preserving and collaborative deep learning assisted diagnosis of fracture: a multi-center diagnostic study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A novel collaborative and continual learning across a network of decentralised healthcare units, avoiding identifiable data-sharing capacity, is proposed. Currently available methodologies, such as federated learning and swarm learning, have demonstrated decentralised learning. However, the majority of them face shortcomings that affect their performance and accuracy. These shortcomings include a non-uniform rate of data accumulation, non-uniform patient demographics, biased human labelling, and erroneous or malicious training data. A novel method to reduce such shortcomings is proposed in the present work through selective grouping and displacing of actors in a network of many entities for intra-group sharing of learning with inter-group accessibility. The proposed system, known as Orbital Learning, incorporates various features from split learning and ensemble learning for a robust and secure performance of supervised models. A digital embodiment of the information quality and flow within a decentralised network, this platform also acts as a digital twin of healthcare network. An example of ECG classification for arrhythmia with 6 clients is used to analyse its performance and is compared against federated learning. In this example, four separate experiments are conducted with varied configurations, such as varied age demographics and clients with data tampering. The results obtained show an average area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.819 (95% CI 0.784-0.853) for orbital learning whereas 0.714 (95% CI 0.692-0.736) for federated learning. This result shows an increase in overall performance and establishes that the proposed system can address the majority of the issues faced by existing decentralised learning methodologies. Further, a scalability demo conducted establishes the versatility and scalability of this platform in handling state-of-the-art large language models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.