ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024
Reverse engineering morphogenesis through Bayesian optimization of physics-based models.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rules of life at the interface of calcium signaling and mechanobiology.APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Gene circuit-based sensors.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Piezo regulates epithelial topology and promotes precision in organ size control.Cell reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Morphogenetic programs coordinate cell signaling and mechanical interactions to shape organs. In systems and synthetic biology, a key challenge is determining optimal cellular interactions for predicting organ shape, size, and function. Physics-based models defining the subcellular force distribution facilitate this, but it is challenging to calibrate parameters in these models from data. To solve this inverse problem, we created a Bayesian optimization framework to determine the optimal cellular force distribution such that the predicted organ shapes match the experimentally observed organ shapes. This integrative framework employs Gaussian Process Regression, a non-parametric kernel-based probabilistic machine learning modeling paradigm, to learn the mapping functions relating to the morphogenetic programs that maintain the final organ shape. We calibrated and tested the method on Drosophila wing imaginal discs to study mechanisms that regulate epithelial processes ranging from development to cancer. The parameter estimation framework successfully infers the underlying changes in core parameters needed to match simulation data with imaging data of wing discs perturbed with collagenase. The computational pipeline identifies distinct parameter sets mimicking wild-type shapes. It enables a global sensitivity analysis to support the regulation of actomyosin contractility and basal ECM stiffness to generate and maintain the curved shape of the wing imaginal disc. The optimization framework, combined with experimental imaging, identified that Piezo, a mechanosensitive ion channel, impacts fold formation by regulating the apical-basal balance of actomyosin contractility and elasticity of ECM. This workflow is extensible toward reverse-engineering morphogenesis across organ systems and for real-time control of complex multicellular systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.