ArticleNature communications2024
Free-standing ultrathin silicon wafers and solar cells through edges reinforcement.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation and Experimental Study of Multi-Grain Diamond Cutting of Monocrystalline Silicon.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Ultrafast Sulfur Redox Dynamics Enabled by a PPy@N-TiONano-micro letters · 2026Article
- Fast and Cost-Effective Fabrication of Ultrathin (20 μm) Silicon Substrates by Melt-Spinning.ACS applied electronic materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crystalline silicon solar cells with regular rigidity characteristics dominate the photovoltaic market, while lightweight and flexible thin crystalline silicon solar cells with significant market potential have not yet been widely developed. This is mainly caused by the brittleness of silicon wafers and the lack of a solution that can well address the high breakage rate during thin solar cells fabrication. Here, we present a thin silicon with reinforced ring (TSRR) structure, which is successfully used to prepare free-standing 4.7-μm 4-inch silicon wafers. Experiments and simulations of mechanical properties for both TSRR and conventional thin silicon structures confirm the supporting role of reinforced ring, which can share stress throughout the solar cell preparation and thus suppressing breakage rate. Furthermore, with the help of TSRR structure, an efficiency of 20.33% (certified 20.05%) is achieved on 28-μm silicon solar cell with a breakage rate of ~0%. Combining the simulations of optoelectrical properties for TSRR solar cell, the results indicate high efficiency can be realized by TSRR structure with a suitable width of the ring. Finally, we prepare 50 ~ 60-μm textured 182 × 182 mm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.