Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38714514›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2024

Inflammation indexes and machine-learning algorithm in predicting urethroplasty success.

Emre Tokuc, Mithat Eksi, Ridvan Kayar, Samet Demir, Ramazan Topaktas, Yavuz Bastug, Mehmet Akyuz, Metin Ozturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emre TokucUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye. emretokuc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5885-9278
Mithat EksiUrology Clinic, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1490-3756
Ridvan KayarUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1765-919X
Samet DemirUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-8696
Ramazan TopaktasUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3729-3284
Yavuz BastugUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9256-940X
Mehmet AkyuzUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0638-7520
Metin OzturkUrology Clinic, Haydarpasa Numune SUAM, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1868-2316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the predictive capability of hematological inflammatory markers for urethral stricture recurrence after primary urethroplasty and to compare traditional statistical methods with a machine-learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo hundred eighty-seven patients who underwent primary urethroplasty were scanned. Ages, smoking status, comorbidities, hematological inflammatory parameters (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios, platelet-lymphocyte ratios [PLR], systemic immune-inflammation indexes [SII], and pan-immune-inflammation values [PIV]), stricture characteristics, history of previous direct-visual internal urethrotomy, urethroplasty techniques, and grafts/flaps placements were collected. Patients were followed up for one year for recurrence and grouped accordingly. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to create a predictive model. Additionally, a machine-learning-based logistic regression analysis was implemented to compare predictive performances. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsComparative analysis between the groups revealed statistically significant differences in stricture length (p=0.003), localization (p=0.027), lymphocyte counts (p=0.008), PLR (p=0.003), SII (p=0.003), and PIV (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, stricture length (odds ratio [OR] 1.230, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.142-1.539, p<0.0001) and PIV (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.000-1.003, p=0.039) were identified as significant predictors of recurrence. Classical logistic regression model exhibited a sensitivity of 0.76, specificity of 0.43 with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.65. However, the machine-learning algorithm outperformed traditional methods achieving a sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.76 with a higher AUC of 0.82.

conclusionsPIV and machine-learning algorithms shows promise on predicting urethroplasty outcomes, potentially leading to develop possible nomograms. Evolving machine-learning algorithms will contribute to more personalized and accurate approaches in managing urethral stricture.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningUrethraUrethral StrictureAdultAgedHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleArtificial intelligenceBiomarkersUrethraUrethral stricture

Identifiers

PMID38714514
PMCPMC11076797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.