Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38714357›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2024

Comparison of Rodent Infectious Agent Detection by Exhaust Dust Testing and Traditional Sentinel Testing Using Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Taylor Simmons, Yesen Zhou, Lea Ann Chlebek, Cherie Chang, Lexi Frank, Jason Villano, Cheryl Perkins, Ken Henderson, Zachary T Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rodent Pathogen Detection via Testing of Soiled Nesting Material.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taylor SimmonsUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yesen ZhouUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lea Ann ChlebekUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Cherie ChangUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lexi FrankUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jason VillanoResearch Animal Resources, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Cheryl PerkinsCharles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts.
Ken HendersonCharles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts.
Zachary T FreemanUnit for Laboratory Animal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved diagnostic capabilities and a desire to reduce or refine the use of animals as soiled bedding sentinels (SBS) have driven interest in developing the use of PCR-based testing methods, such as exhaust dust testing (EDT), for routine rodent health surveillance. We compared the absolute and quantitative PCR results from EDT filters with SBS mice by routine screening via a panel of 19 infectious agents including agents known to be excluded or present in the colony. In this study, EDT and SBS were compared at days 0, 90, and 180 in 3 facilities (

Identifiers

PMID38714357
PMCPMC11467870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.