Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713725›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Pebble to the Metal: A Boulder Approach to Enrichment for Danio rerio.

Kyna A Byrd, Jacob H Theil, Jerome T Geronimo, Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire, Michael F Gutierrez, Emily I Hui, Teagan K Felt, Kendall M Coden, Anna S Ratuski, Stephen A Felt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kyna A ByrdDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0008-8521-9701
Jacob H TheilCampus Veterinary Services, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0075-0384
Jerome T GeronimoDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jamie Ahloy-DallaireDepartment of Animal Science, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Michael F GutierrezDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Emily I HuiDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Teagan K FeltDepartment of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kendall M CodenDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-7424
Anna S RatuskiDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stephen A FeltDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
David K ChuDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Joseph P GarnerDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish are an established and widely used animal model, yet there is limited understanding of their welfare needs. Despite an increasing number of studies on zebrafish enrichment, in-tank environmental enrichment remains unpopular among researchers. This is due to perceived concerns over health/hygiene when it comes to introducing enrichment into the tank, although actual evidence for this is sparse. To accommodate this belief, regardless of veracity, we tested the potential benefits of enrichments presented outside the tank. Thus, we investigated the preferences and physiological stress of zebrafish with pictures of pebbles placed underneath the tank. We hypothesized that zebrafish would show a preference for enriched environments and have lower stress levels than barren housed zebrafish. In our first experiment, we housed zebrafish in a standard rack system and recorded their preference for visual access to a pebble picture, with two positive controls: visual access to conspecifics, and group housing. Using a crossover repeated-measures factorial design, we tested if the preference for visual access to pebbles was as strong as the preference for social contact. Zebrafish showed a strong preference for visual access to pebbles, equivalent to that for conspecifics. Then, in a second experiment, tank water cortisol was measured to assess chronic stress levels of zebrafish housed with or without a pebble picture under their tank, with group housing as a positive control. Cortisol levels were significantly reduced in zebrafish housed with pebble pictures, as were cortisol levels in group housed zebrafish. In fact, single housed zebrafish with pebble pictures showed the same cortisol levels as group housed zebrafish without pebble pictures. Thus, the use of an under-tank pebble picture was as beneficial as being group housed, effectively compensating for the stress of single housing. Pebble picture enrichment had an additive effect with group housing, where group housed zebrafish with pebble pictures had the lowest cortisol levels of any treatment group.

Indexed as

Housing, AnimalHydrocortisoneZebrafishAnimalsAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleStress, PhysiologicalHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID38713725
PMCPMC11075867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.