Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713705›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Newborn care knowledge and practices among care givers of newborns and young infants attending a regional referral hospital in Southwestern Uganda.

Dorah Nampijja, Stella Kyoyagala, Elizabeth Najjingo, Josephine N Najjuma, Onesmus Byamukama, Lydia Kyasimire, Jerome Kabakyenga, Elias Kumbakumba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dorah NampijjaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3065-3208
Stella KyoyagalaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Elizabeth NajjingoMbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda.
Josephine N NajjumaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Onesmus ByamukamaMbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda.
Lydia KyasimireMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Jerome KabakyengaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Elias KumbakumbaMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A child born in developing countries has a 10 times higher mortality risk compared to one born in developed countries. Uganda still struggles with a high neonatal mortality rate at 27/1000 live births. Majority of these death occur in the community when children are under the sole care of their parents and guardian. Lack of knowledge in new born care, inappropriate new born care practices are some of the contributors to neonatal mortality in Uganda. Little is known about parent/caregivers' knowledge, practices and what influences these practices while caring for the newborns. We systematically studied and documented newborn care knowledge, practices and associated factors among parents and care givers. To assess new born care knowledge, practices and associated factors among parents and care givers attending MRRH. We carried out a quantitative cross section methods study among caregivers of children from birth to six weeks of life attending a regional referral hospital in south western Uganda. Using pretested structured questionnaires, data was collected about care givers' new born care knowledge, practices and the associated factors. Data analysis was done using Stata version 17.0. We interviewed 370 caregivers, majority of whom were the biological mothers at 86%. Mean age was 26 years, 14% were unemployed and 74% had monthly earning below the poverty line. Mothers had a high antenatal care attendance of 97.6% and 96.2% of the deliveries were at a health facility Care givers had variant knowledge of essential newborn care with associated incorrect practices. Majority (84.6%) of the respondents reported obliviousness to putting anything in the babies' eyes at birth, however, breastmilk, water and saliva were reportedly put in the babies' eyes at birth by some caregivers. Hand washing was not practiced at all in 16.2% of the caregivers before handling the newborn. About 7.4% of the new borns received a bath within 24 hours of delivery and 19% reported use of herbs. Caregivers practiced adequate thermal care 87%. Cord care practices were inappropriate in 36.5%. Only 21% of the respondents reported initiation of breast feeding within 1 hour of birth, Prelacteal feeds were given by 37.6% of the care givers, water being the commonest prelacteal feed followed by cow's milk at 40.4 and 18.4% respectively. Majority of the respondents had below average knowledge about danger signs in the newborn where 63% and mean score for knowledge about danger signs was 44%. Caretaker's age and relationship with the newborn were found to have a statistically significant associated to knowledge of danger signs in the newborn baby. There are variable incorrect practices in the essential new born care and low knowledge and awareness of danger signs among caregivers of newborn babies. There is high health center deliveries and antenatal care attendance among the respondents could be used as an opportunity to increase caregiver awareness about the inappropriate practices in essential newborn care and the danger signs in a newborn.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38713705
PMCPMC11075863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.