Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713678›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Development, confirmation, and application of a seeded Escherichia coli process control organism to validate Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi environmental surveillance methods.

Sarah E Philo, Nicolette A Zhou, Lorraine M Lillis, Venkata Raghava, Dilip Abraham, Vinoth Kumar, Nirmal Kumar, Jonathan Rigby, Joanna Ciol Harrison, Christine S Fagnant-Sperati and 12 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sarah E PhiloDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9894-0425
Nicolette A ZhouDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Lorraine M LillisPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Venkata RaghavaChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
Dilip AbrahamChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9772-9508
Vinoth KumarChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
Nirmal KumarChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
Jonathan RigbyMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Programme, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-0981
Joanna Ciol HarrisonDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Christine S Fagnant-SperatiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alexandra L KossikDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Angelo Q W OngDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Rachael SwanstromDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Elisabeth BurnorDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Bethel DemekeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nicola K BeckDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jeffry H ShiraiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Stephen J LibbyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
David S BoylePATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nicholas FeaseyMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Programme, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Gagandeep KangChristian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, India.
John Scott MeschkeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8983-9042

Funding

Biostatistics, Epidemiologic & Bioinformatic Training in Environmental HealthT32ES015459 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI June T. Spector · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
Gates Foundation INV-000508NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES015459Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) is the causative agent of Typhoid fever. Blood culture is the gold standard for clinical diagnosis, but this is often difficult to employ in resource limited settings. Environmental surveillance of waste-impacted waters is a promising supplement to clinical surveillance, however validating methods is challenging in regions where S. Typhi concentrations are low. To evaluate existing S. Typhi environmental surveillance methods, a novel process control organism (PCO) was created as a biosafe surrogate. Using a previous described qPCR assay, a modified PCR amplicon for the staG gene was cloned into E. coli. We developed a target region that was recognized by the Typhoid primers in addition to a non-coding internal probe sequence. A multiplex qPCR reaction was developed that differentiates between the typhoid and control targets, with no cross-reactivity or inhibition of the two probes. The PCO was shown to mimic S. Typhi in lab-based experiments with concentration methods using primary wastewater: filter cartridge, recirculating Moore swabs, membrane filtration, and differential centrifugation. Across all methods, the PCO seeded at 10 CFU/mL and 100 CFU/mL was detected in 100% of replicates. The PCO is detected at similar quantification cycle (Cq) values across all methods at 10 CFU/mL (Average = 32.4, STDEV = 1.62). The PCO was also seeded into wastewater at collection sites in Vellore (India) and Blantyre (Malawi) where S. Typhi is endemic. All methods tested in both countries were positive for the seeded PCO. The PCO is an effective way to validate performance of environmental surveillance methods targeting S. Typhi in surface water.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringEscherichia coliSalmonella typhiHumansTyphoid FeverWastewaterWater MicrobiologyWastewater

Identifiers

PMID38713678
PMCPMC11075847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.