Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713452›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2024

Sex Differences Between Female and Male Individuals in Antipsychotic Efficacy and Adverse Effects in the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

Megan Galbally, Karen Wynter, Dan Siskind, Christoph U Correll, Korinne Northwood, Susanna Every-Palmer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan GalballySchool of Clinical Sciences, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. megan.galbally@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-1918
Karen WynterSchool of Clinical Sciences, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4620-7691
Dan SiskindFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2072-9216
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7254-5646
Korinne NorthwoodFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-547X
Susanna Every-PalmerDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-9741

Funding

STN/Three Individual Projects: COATS, METS, CRSTNN01MH90001 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STROUP, SCOTT · 2007 to 2009
$6.7M
Medical Research Council GNT1194635NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH90001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAntipsychotics are core treatments for people living with psychotic disorders. Understanding individualised factors that influence both efficacy and adverse responses will improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine sex differences in antipsychotic-related efficacy and tolerability.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of data from phase 1 and 1a of Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE); participants with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to double-blinded treatment with oral olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone or perphenazine. Measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and Calgary Depression Rating Scale, as well as self-reported side effects, medication compliance, dosage, weight measurements and various blood parameters.

resultsThere were 1460 participants including 380 female and 1080 male individuals. Very few differences existed between male and female participants in response, adverse reactions, compliance or antipsychotic dosage. However, significantly more female participants than male participants reported constipation (28% vs 16%), dry mouth (50% vs 38%), gynecomastia/galactorrhea (11% vs 3%), incontinence/nocturia (16% vs 8%) and self reported weight gain (37% vs 24%) [all p < 0.001]. Within the risperidone treatment group, there was a significantly greater increase in prolactin levels (p < 0.001) among female participants (n = 61) than male participants (n = 159). No overall differences in clinician-rated measures, weight gain or other laboratory indicators were found.

conclusionsWhile overall sex differences were limited across efficacy and tolerability for antipsychotic treatment, there were some specific findings with risperidone. Further examination of sex differences within antipsychotic trials will be important to improve efficacy and reduce adverse responses across as well as individualising care for people with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaSex CharacteristicsAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID38713452
PMCPMC11182865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.