Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713309›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2024

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Evinacumab in Treating Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertriglyceridemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Hussain Sohail Rangwala, Hareer Fatima, Mirha Ali, Muhammad Ashir Shafiq, Burhanuddin Sohail Rangwala, Vikash Virwani, Aashish Kumar, Syed Ali Arsal, Adarsh Raja, Sandesh Raja and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hussain Sohail RangwalaDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan. srangwala01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2167-3481
Hareer FatimaDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mirha AliDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ashir ShafiqDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan.
Burhanuddin Sohail RangwalaDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan.
Vikash VirwaniDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aashish KumarDepartment of Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Ali ArsalDepartment of Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.
Adarsh RajaDepartment of Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sandesh RajaDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Saqlain MustafaDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Iqbal Shaheed Rd, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease remains a significant global health concern, with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels contributing to an increased risk. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) further complicates its management, necessitating additional lipid-lowering therapies. Evinacumab, an angiopoietin-like protein 3 monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a potential treatment, particularly for patients with FH, by effectively reducing LDL-C and triglyceride levels. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evinacumab across diverse patient populations.

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were systematically retrieved from multiple databases until November 24, 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies comparing evinacumab (at doses of 5 and 15 mg) to placebo, with outcomes focusing on lipid levels and adverse events. Standardized protocols were employed for data extraction and quality assessment, and statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan software.

resultsFour RCTs, involving 270 patients, were included in the analysis. The analysis revealed significant reductions in lipid markers, particularly with the 15-mg dose of evinacumab, including triacylglycerols (standard mean difference [SMD] = -6.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 14.53 to 2.36, P = 0.16), total cholesterol (SMD = - 6.20, 95% CI - 11.53 to - 0.88, P = 0.02), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD = - 0.79, 95% CI - 1.27 to - 0.31, P = 0.001), LDL-C (SMD = - 4.58, 95% CI - 9.13 to - 0.03, P = 0.05), apolipoprotein (Apo) B (SMD = - 4.01, 95% CI - 7.53 to - 0.46, P = 0.03), and Apo C3 (SMD = - 7.67, 95% CI - 12.94 to - 2.41, P = 0.004). Adverse event analysis revealed no significant association, indicating good tolerability.

conclusionHigh-dose evinacumab (15 mg) consistently demonstrated efficacy in reducing cholesterol and other lipid markers, with favorable tolerability. Further research is warranted to comprehensively assess its safety and clinical effectiveness, emphasizing the need for additional data to support its use in managing cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalHypercholesterolemiaHypertriglyceridemiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAngiopoietin-Like Protein 3Cholesterol, LDLHumansTriglyceridesAngiopoietin-Like Protein 3Antibodies, MonoclonalCholesterol, LDLevinacumabTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID38713309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.