Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713278›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

"Feed-and-wrap" technique versus deep sedation for neonatal magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective comparative study.

André Lollert, Kim Sophie Frey, Christian Hoffmann, Markus Herbst, Jochem König, Isabella Schmeh, Frank Dette, Gundula Staatz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

André LollertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. andre.lollert@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-8362
Kim Sophie FreyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Christian HoffmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Markus HerbstInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Jochem KönigInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Isabella SchmehDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Frank DetteDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Gundula StaatzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNeonatal MRI is usually performed under deep sedation, which is challenging-especially in low-weight premature patients. In addition, long-term side effects, such as neurotoxicity, are of concern. An alternative to sedation is to induce natural sleep by feeding and immobilising the child, the "feed-and-wrap" technique (FWT). The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in image quality between neonates examined under sedation and by using the FWT during the first four months of life. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively assessed image quality (based on a 4-point semiquantitative scale) of all MRI examinations in neonates performed at our institution between July 2009 and August 2022. Differences in image quality between examinations under sedation versus FWT were evaluated.

resultsWe included 432 consecutive patients, 243 (56%) using sedation and 189 (44%) using the FWT. Corrected age and body weight (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 1.1 versus 4.5 ± 1.3 kg, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the FWT group. The overall success rate in the FWT group was 95%. Image quality was slightly lower when using the FWT (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.43 versus 3.96 ± 0.11, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a higher risk of acquiring sequences with diagnostic limitations in the FWT group (p < 0.001), increasing with corrected age (p = 0.048).

conclusionThe FWT is a highly successful method to perform MRI scans in term and preterm neonates. Overall image quality is only slightly lower than under sedation. Especially in immature low-weight preterm patients, the FWT is a reliable option to perform MRI studies without exposing the child to risks associated with sedation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The "feed-and-wrap" technique enables high-quality MRI examinations in neonates, including low-weight premature patients. Deep sedation for diagnostic MRI procedures in this age group, which has the risk of short- and long-term complications, can often be avoided. KEY POINTS: Deeply sedating neonates for MR examinations comes with risks. Image quality is only slightly lower when using the "feed-and-wrap" technique. The "feed-and-wrap" technique is feasible even in low-weight premature infants.

Indexed as

Deep SedationMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleRetrospective Studies“Feed-and-wrap”InfantMagnetic resonance imagingNeonateSedation

Identifiers

PMID38713278
PMCPMC11519104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.