Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713246›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

Enhanced fracture risk prediction: a novel multi-trait genetic approach integrating polygenic scores of fracture-related traits.

Xiangxue Xiao, Qing Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clarifying the interpretation of metapgs and cumulative incidence in fracture risk prediction.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangxue XiaoNevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, College of Science, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Qing WuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 250 Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Dr, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. qing.wu@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-8903

Funding

The Genome Analysis and Sequencing Pipeline (GASP)P20GM121325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI GUHA, PRASUN · 2018 to 2022
$11.5M
Does Creating Person-specific Precision Thresholds Enhance the Ability of a Single Bone Density Measure to Predict Fractures in Minority Women?R01AG080017 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Qing Wu · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Precise Bone Density Reference Ranges to Reduce Systematic Disparities in Osteoporosis Healthcare for Hispanic WomenR21MD013681 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI WU, QING · 2022 to 2023
$405k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080017NIA NIH HHS R01AG080017NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121325NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM121325NIMHD NIH HHS R21 MD013681NIMHD NIH HHS R21MD013681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel metaPGS, integrating multiple fracture-related genetic traits, surpasses traditional polygenic scores in predicting fracture risk. Demonstrating a robust association with incident fractures, this metaPGS offers significant potential for enhancing clinical fracture risk assessment and tailoring prevention strategies.

introductionCurrent polygenic scores (PGS) have limited predictive power for fracture risk. To improve genetic prediction, we developed and evaluated a novel metaPGS combining genetic information from multiple fracture-related traits.

methodsWe derived individual PGS from genome-wide association studies of 16 fracture-related traits and employed an elastic-net logistic regression model to examine the association between the 16 PGSs and fractures. An optimal metaPGS was constructed by combining 11 significant individual PGSs selected by the elastic regularized regression model. We evaluated the predictive power of the metaPGS alone and in combination with clinical risk factors recommended by guidelines. The discrimination ability of metaPGS was assessed using the concordance index. Reclassification was assessed using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

resultsThe metaPGS had a significant association with incident fractures (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.18-1.25 per standard deviation of metaPGS), which was stronger than previously developed bone mineral density (BMD)-related individual PGSs. Models with PGS_FNBMD, PGS_TBBMD, and metaPGS had slightly higher but statistically non-significant c-index than the base model (0.640, 0.644, 0.644 vs. 0.638). However, the reclassification analysis showed that compared to the base model, the model with metaPGS improves the reclassification of fracture.

conclusionsThe metaPGS is a promising approach for stratifying fracture risk in the European population, improving fracture risk prediction by combining genetic information from multiple fracture-related traits.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritanceOsteoporotic FracturesAdultAgedBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDisease and disorders of/related to boneFracture risk assessmentGenetic researchHuman association studiesOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38713246
PMCPMC11282140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.