Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713226›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2025

Treatment of fecal incontinence-is there a light in the end of the tunnel?

Stefan Riss, Christopher Dawoud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefan RissDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. stefan.riss@meduniwien.ac.at.
Christopher DawoudDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-2804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common disease with higher incidence rates in the elderly population. Treatment of affected patients remains challenging and ranges from conservative management to surgical techniques. Despite all efforts patients often undergo several therapeutic measurements to achieve reasonable functional improvements.Although sacral neuromodulation still remains a key therapy with success rates up to 80%, a significant number of patients do not respond sufficiently and require further treatment.Several artificial bowel sphincter devices exist, which can lead to better functional control in selected patients. Notably, complications after these surgeries do occur frequently and the need for implant replacement is still considerable high.A novel anal band, developed by Agency for Medical Innovations (A.M.I., Austria) is currently under evaluation. This device, composed of silicone and polyester, is placed around the anus outside the external sphincter muscle complex aiming to improve stool continence via mechanical pressure. Early results of this new operation are eagerly awaited.

Indexed as

Anal CanalElectric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceProstheses and ImplantsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansProsthesis DesignTreatment OutcomeAnal bandArtificial bowel sphincterFecal incontinenceMinimally invasive surgerySacral neuromodulationSIMPLYFISphinkeeper®

Identifiers

PMID38713226
PMCPMC11739313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.