Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713221›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Imaging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract : Value of (hybrid) imaging diagnostics in radiology].

R Ebner, J Rübenthaler, J Ricke, G T Sheikh, L M Unterrainer, C J Auernhammer, C Spitzweg, M Brendel, C Schmid-Tannwald, C C Cyran

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R EbnerKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. ricarda.ebner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
J RübenthalerKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
J RickeKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
G T SheikhKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
L M UnterrainerKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
C J AuernhammerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
C SpitzwegMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
M BrendelKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
C Schmid-TannwaldKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
C C CyranKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueNeuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that predominantly arise in the gastrointestinal tract. At the time of initial diagnosis, the NET has already spread locoregionally in about half of the patients, and 27% of patients have already developed distant metastases. Since this plays a crucial role in therapy planning, accurate diagnostic imaging is important. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsDue to its high temporal and spatial resolution (multiphasic including arterial phase), computed tomography (CT) plays a decisive role in primary staging and follow-up care, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its excellent soft tissue contrast offers advantages in the assessment of parenchymal organs in the upper abdomen. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET) provides additional functional information that not only helps to detect the primary tumor and distant metastases, but also has a significant influence on therapeutic management in a theranostic approach. PERFORMANCE: Hybrid imaging using SSR-PET/CT has proven to be particularly effective in the detection of NET. Compared to conventional imaging, it provides additional information in 68% of patients, which has a significant impact on clinical management. ACHIEVEMENTS: Imaging of NET requires the combined use of various methods such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and PET/CT to enable accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: SSR-PET/CT is a valuable tool for the accurate staging of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, especially with small metastases, while MRI with hepatocyte-specific contrast agent and diffusion-weighted imaging is useful for the specific assessment of liver metastases.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedImaging techniquesMolecular imagingNETPositron emission tomographyTumor staging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.