Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38713123›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2024

Benefit-Cost Analysis of the HHS COVID-19 Campaign: April 2021-March 2022.

Sidney Turner, Elissa C Kranzler, Sarah Trigger, Aaron Kearsley, Joseph N Luchman, Christopher J Williams, Benjamin Denison, Heather Dahlen, Jae-Eun C Kim, Morgane Bennett and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sidney TurnerFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Elissa C KranzlerFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic address: ekranzler@forsmarsh.com.
Sarah TriggerU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia.
Aaron KearsleyU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Washington, District of Columbia.
Joseph N LuchmanFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Christopher J WilliamsFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Benjamin DenisonFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Heather DahlenFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Jae-Eun C KimFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Morgane BennettU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia.
Tyler NighborU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia.
Trinidad BelecheU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Washington, District of Columbia.
Leah HoffmanFors Marsh, Arlington, Virginia.
Joshua PeckIndependent Researcher.

Funding

NIA COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR RECRUITMENT AND PARTICIPATION IN ALZHEIMER'S AND RELATED DEMENTIAS CLINICAL RESEARC75N98019D00007 · NIDA · FORS MARSH GROUP LLC · PI ANDREW, HALE · 2019 to 2021
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS 75N98019D00007OLAO NIH HHS 75N98019D00007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study estimated the benefits and costs of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' We Can Do This COVID-19 public education campaign (the Campaign) and associated vaccination-related impacts.

methodsWeekly media market and national Campaign expenditures were used to estimate weekly first-dose vaccinations that would not have occurred absent the Campaign, weekly Campaign-attributed complete vaccinations, and corresponding COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths averted. Benefits were valued using estimated morbidity and mortality reductions and associated values of a statistical life and a statistical case. Costs were estimated using Campaign paid media expenditures and corresponding vaccination costs. The net Campaign and vaccination benefit and return on investment were calculated. Analyses were conducted from 2022 to 2024.

resultsBetween April 2021 and March 2022, an estimated 55.9 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines would not have been administered absent the Campaign. Campaign-attributed vaccinations resulted in 2,576,133 fewer mild COVID-19 cases, 243,979 fewer nonfatal COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 51,675 lives saved from COVID-19. The total Campaign benefit was $740.2 billion, and Campaign and vaccination costs totaled $8.3 billion, with net benefits of approximately $732.0 billion. For every $1 spent, the Campaign and corresponding vaccination costs resulted in benefits of approximately $89.54.

conclusionsThe We Can Do This COVID-19 public education campaign saved more than 50,000 lives and prevented hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and millions of COVID-19 cases, representing hundreds of billions of dollars in benefits in less than one year. Findings suggest that public education campaigns are a cost-effective approach to reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PromotionHospitalizationHumansSARS-CoV-2United StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38713123
PMCPMC11260528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.