Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38712716›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2024

Clinical trial evaluating apomorphine oromucosal solution in Parkinson's disease patients.

Eva Thijssen, Bert Tuk, Michel Cakici, Veerle van Velze, Erica Klaassen, Frans Merkus, Teus van Laar, Philip Kremer, Geert Jan Groeneveld

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eva ThijssenCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-072X
Bert TukCriceto IKM, Casteren, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2268-666X
Michel CakiciCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3098-5619
Veerle van VelzeCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erica KlaassenCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0089-1846
Frans MerkusInnotesto BV, Kasterlee, Belgium.
Teus van LaarGroningen University Medical Center (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5088-480X
Philip KremerCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0483-841X
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research (CHDR), Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-6667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apomorphine, used to treat OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), is typically administered via subcutaneous injections. Administration of an oromucosal solution could offer a non-invasive and user-friendly alternative. This two-part clinical study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dose proportionality of a novel apomorphine hydrochloride oromucosal solution, as well as its relative bioavailability to subcutaneous apomorphine injection and apomorphine sublingual film. In part A of the study, 12 patients with PD received 2 mg oromucosal apomorphine (4% weight/volume) and 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 4 and 8 mg oromucosal apomorphine. In part B of the study, 13 patients with PD received 7 mg oromucosal apomorphine (7% weight/volume) and 30 mg sublingual apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine. Washout between dose administrations in both study parts was at least 2 days. Safety, tolerability, and PK were assessed pre- and post-dose. Both study parts showed that oromucosal apomorphine was generally well-tolerated. Observed side effects were typical for apomorphine administration and included asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension, yawning, fatigue, and somnolence. Oromucosal apomorphine exposure increased with dose, although less than dose proportional. The mean (SD) maximum exposure reached with 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine was 753.0 (298.6) ng*min/mL (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) and 8.0 (3.3) ng/mL (maximum plasma concentration). This was comparable to exposure reached after 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine and approximately half of the exposure observed with 30 mg sublingual apomorphine. In summary, clinically relevant plasma concentrations could be reached in PD patients without tolerability issues.

Indexed as

ApomorphineParkinson DiseaseAdministration, OralAdministration, SublingualAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntiparkinson AgentsBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedAntiparkinson AgentsApomorphine

Identifiers

PMID38712716
PMCPMC11075157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.