Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38712517›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2024

Validation and reliability of the Italian version of the Self-reported Mini Olfactory Questionnaire (Self-MOQ).

Giuseppe Riva, Giancarlo Pecorari, Gian Marco Motatto, Marianna Rivero, Andrea Canale, Roberto Albera, Andrea Albera

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giuseppe RivaDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giancarlo PecorariDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gian Marco MotattoDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marianna RiveroDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Andrea CanaleDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Roberto AlberaDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Andrea AlberaDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) represents a frequent complaint in general population and especially in patients with chronic sinonasal diseases. The aim of this study was the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Self-reported Mini Olfactory Questionnaire (Self-MOQ) into Italian. Methods: One hundred fifty patients affected by chronic sinonasal diseases and reporting hyposmia were enrolled. Other 150 normosmic subjects without inflammatory or neoplastic sinonasal disorders were used as a control group. The Short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used for clinical validity. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.825. The test-retest reliability was excellent. The good correlation between the Self-MOQ and the Visual Analogue Scale scores (p < 0.05) demonstrated the construct validity of the questionnaire. The Self-MOQ was able to distinguish between subjects with or without OD (p < 0.05). Higher Self-MOQ score was found in case of nasal obstruction and posterior rhinorrhoea (p < 0.05). Self-MOQ showed significant correlation with SF-36 general health, SF-36 role functioning/physical, and SF-36 pain (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The Italian version of the Self-MOQ showed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct, and clinical validity.

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersSelf ReportAdultAgedFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsYoung Adultchronic rhinosinusitisolfactory disordersquality of liferhinitis questionnairesmell

Identifiers

PMID38712517
PMCPMC11166215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.