Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38712374›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug targets2024

Vaccine for Targeted Therapy of Lung Cancer: Advances and Developments.

Suraj Kumar, Rishabha Malviya, Prerna Uniyal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug targets, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suraj KumarDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, U.P., India.
Rishabha MalviyaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, U.P., India.ORCID 0000-0003-2874-6149
Prerna UniyalSchool of Pharmacy, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering that lung cancer is a leading global perpetrator, novel treatment approaches must be investigated. Due to the broad spectrum of lung cancer, conventional therapies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgeries, are not always effective and can have adverse consequences. The present study's overarching objective was to enhance the development of a personalized vaccine for targeted lung cancer therapy. Vaccination functions by eliciting a strong and targeted immune response defense by taking advantage of the specific antigens that are expressed by lung cancer cells. Crucial antigens associated with tumor cells have been identified with the recognition of the genetic and immunological circumstances of lung cancer in this review. The vaccine includes these antigens to prime the immune system, directing it toward recognizing and attacking cancerous cells. In this review, we have addressed the possible benefits of a targeted vaccine strategy, which include a reduction in off-target effects and an improvement in health outcomes for patients. These studies highlight the promise of a tailored vaccine in a novel way for the treatment of lung cancer. The integration of molecular profiling and immunological insights offers a rationale for the design and implementation of personalized vaccines. While challenges exist, the promise of improved treatment outcomes and reduced side effects positions targeted vaccine therapy as a compelling avenue for advancing lung cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesLung NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinescancerimmunotherapyLung cancerpatient care.targeted therapyvaccine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.