ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Quantifying and controlling the proteolytic degradation of cell adhesion peptides.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peptides are widely used within biomaterials to improve cell adhesion, incorporate bioactive ligands, and enable cell-mediated degradation of the matrix. While many of the peptides incorporated into biomaterials are intended to be present throughout the life of the material, their stability is not typically quantified during culture. In this work we designed a series of peptide libraries containing four different N-terminal peptide functionalizations and three C-terminal functionalization to better understand how simple modifications can be used to reduce non-specific degradation of peptides. We tested these libraries with three cell types commonly used in biomaterials research, including mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (hMSCs), endothelial cells, and macrophages, and quantified how these cell types non-specifically degraded peptide as a function of terminal amino acid and chemistry. We found that peptides in solution which contained N-terminal amines were almost entirely degraded by 48 hours, irrespective of the terminal amino acid, and that degradation occurred even at high peptide concentrations. Peptides with C-terminal carboxylic acids also had significant degradation when cultured with cells. We found that simple modifications to the termini could significantly reduce or completely abolish non-specific degradation when soluble peptides were added to cells cultured on tissue culture plastic or within hydrogel matrices, and that functionalizations which mimicked peptide conjugations to hydrogel matrices significantly slowed non-specific degradation. We also found that there were minimal differences across cell donors, and that sequences mimicking different peptides commonly-used to functionalized biomaterials all had significant non-specific degradation. Finally, we saw that there was a positive trend between RGD stability and hMSC spreading within hydrogels, indicating that improving the stability of peptides within biomaterial matrices may improve the performance of engineered matrices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.