ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
A flexible intracortical brain-computer interface for typing using finger movements.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Keyboard typing with finger movements is a versatile digital interface for users with diverse skills, needs, and preferences. Currently, such an interface does not exist for people with paralysis. We developed an intracortical brain-computer interface (BCI) for typing with attempted flexion/extension movements of three finger groups on the right hand, or both hands, and demonstrated its flexibility in two dominant typing paradigms. The first paradigm is "point-and-click" typing, where a BCI user selects one key at a time using continuous real-time control, allowing selection of arbitrary sequences of symbols. During cued character selection with this paradigm, a human research participant with paralysis achieved 30-40 selections per minute with nearly 90% accuracy. The second paradigm is "keystroke" typing, where the BCI user selects each character by a discrete movement without real-time feedback, often giving a faster speed for natural language sentences. With 90 cued characters per minute, decoding attempted finger movements and correcting errors using a language model resulted in more than 90% accuracy. Notably, both paradigms matched the state-of-the-art for BCI performance and enabled further flexibility by the simultaneous selection of multiple characters as well as efficient decoder estimation across paradigms. Overall, the high-performance interface is a step towards the wider accessibility of BCI technology by addressing unmet user needs for flexibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.