Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38712189›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A flexible intracortical brain-computer interface for typing using finger movements.

Nishal P Shah, Matthew S Willsey, Nick Hahn, Foram Kamdar, Donald T Avansino, Chaofei Fan, Leigh R Hochberg, Francis R Willett, Jaimie M Henderson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nishal P ShahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-1275-0381
Matthew S WillseyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.
Nick HahnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.
Foram KamdarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.
Donald T AvansinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.
Chaofei FanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-548X
Leigh R HochbergVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-2273
Francis R WillettHoward Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-8511
Jaimie M HendersonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-2267

Funding

Engaging new cognitive and motor signals to improve communication prosthesesR01DC014034 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JAIMIE M HENDERSON · 2015 to 2026
$8.2M
Understanding the Neural Basis of Volitional State through Continuous Recordings in HumansU01NS098968 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CASH, SYDNEY S · 2016 to 2018
$4.7M
Intuitive, complete neural control of tablet computers for communicationU01DC017844 · NIDCD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2019 to 2025
$4.3M
High-Bandwidth Wireless Interfaces for Continuous Human Intracortical RecordingUH2NS095548 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R, NURMIKKO, ARTO · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014034NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC017844NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098968NINDS NIH HHS UH2 NS095548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keyboard typing with finger movements is a versatile digital interface for users with diverse skills, needs, and preferences. Currently, such an interface does not exist for people with paralysis. We developed an intracortical brain-computer interface (BCI) for typing with attempted flexion/extension movements of three finger groups on the right hand, or both hands, and demonstrated its flexibility in two dominant typing paradigms. The first paradigm is "point-and-click" typing, where a BCI user selects one key at a time using continuous real-time control, allowing selection of arbitrary sequences of symbols. During cued character selection with this paradigm, a human research participant with paralysis achieved 30-40 selections per minute with nearly 90% accuracy. The second paradigm is "keystroke" typing, where the BCI user selects each character by a discrete movement without real-time feedback, often giving a faster speed for natural language sentences. With 90 cued characters per minute, decoding attempted finger movements and correcting errors using a language model resulted in more than 90% accuracy. Notably, both paradigms matched the state-of-the-art for BCI performance and enabled further flexibility by the simultaneous selection of multiple characters as well as efficient decoder estimation across paradigms. Overall, the high-performance interface is a step towards the wider accessibility of BCI technology by addressing unmet user needs for flexibility.

Identifiers

PMID38712189
PMCPMC11071346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.