Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38712120›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Cell-TIMP: Cellular Trajectory Inference based on Morphological Parameter.

Piyush Raj, Himanshu Gupta, Pooja Anantha, Ishan Barman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Piyush RajDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Himanshu GuptaCentre for Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems (AASS), Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Pooja AnanthaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ishan BarmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Next-generation optical nanoprobes: From quantum biosensing to cellular monitoringR35GM149272 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ISHAN BARMAN · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular morphology, shaped by various genetic and environmental influences, is pivotal to studying experimental cell biology, necessitating precise measurement and analysis techniques. Traditional approaches, which rely on geometric metrics derived from stained images, encounter obstacles stemming from both the imaging and analytical domains. Staining processes can disrupt the cell's natural state and diminish accuracy due to photobleaching, while conventional analysis techniques, which categorize cells based on shape to discern pathophysiological conditions, often fail to capture the continuous and asynchronous nature of biological processes such as cell differentiation, immune responses, and cancer progression. In this work, we propose the use of quantitative phase imaging for morphological assessment due to its label-free nature. For analysis, we repurposed the genomic analysis toolbox to perform trajectory inference analysis purely based on morphology information. We applied the developed framework to study the progression of leukemia and breast cancer metastasis. Our approach revealed a clear pattern of morphological evolution tied to the diseases' advancement, highlighting the efficacy of our method in identifying functionally significant shape changes where conventional techniques falter. This advancement offers a fresh perspective on analyzing cellular morphology and holds significant potential for the broader research community, enabling a deeper understanding of complex biological dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID38712120
PMCPMC11071304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.