Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711911›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Association between defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval and short-term outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and an initial shockable rhythm.

Shoji Kawakami, Yoshio Tahara, Teruo Noguchi, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenobu Koga, Jun-Ichiro Nishi, Naohiro Yonemoto, Hiroshi Nonogi, Takanori Ikeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shoji KawakamiDepartment of Cardiology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshio TaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Teruo NoguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Satoshi YasudaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Hidenobu KogaClinical Research Support Office, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Jun-Ichiro NishiDepartment of Cardiology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Naohiro YonemotoDepartment of Public Health, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi NonogiFaculty of Health Science, Osaka Aoyama University, Minoo, Japan.
Takanori IkedaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The optimal timing of adrenaline administration after defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and an initial shockable rhythm is unknown. We investigated the association between the defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval and clinical outcomes. Methods: Between 2011 and 2020, we enrolled 1,259,960 patients with OHCA into a nationwide prospective population-based registry in Japan. After applying exclusion criteria, 20,905 patients with an initial shockable rhythm documented at emergency medical services (EMS) arrival who received adrenaline after defibrillation were eligible for this study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to predict favourable short-term outcomes: prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 30-day survival, or a favourable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) at 30 days. Patients were categorised into 2-minute defibrillation-to-adrenaline intervals up to 18 min, or more than 18 min. Results: At 30 days, 1,618 patients (8%) had a favourable neurological outcome. The defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval in these patients was significantly shorter than in patients with an unfavourable neurological outcome [8 (5-12) vs 11 (7-16) minutes; P < 0.001]. The proportion of patients with prehospital ROSC, 30-day survival, or a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days decreased as the defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval increased (P < 0.001 for trend). Multivariable analysis revealed that a defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval of > 6 min was an independent predictor of worse prehospital ROSC, 30-day survival, or neurological outcome at 30 days when compared with an interval of 4-6 min. Conclusion: A longer defibrillation-to-adrenaline interval was significantly associated with worse short-term outcomes in patients with OHCA and an initial shockable rhythm.

Indexed as

AdrenalineCardiac arrestDefibrillationShockable rhythm

Identifiers

PMID38711911
PMCPMC11070920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.