Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711858›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602024

Effectiveness and Persistency of Ustekinumab Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis: A Phoenix retrospective Cohort Study.

Katsuyoshi Ando, Mikihiro Fujiya, Nobuhiro Ueno, Takahiro Ito, Atsuo Maemoto, Masanao Nasuno, Hiroki Tanaka, Kensuke Sakurai, Takehiko Katsurada, Fumika Orii and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Katsuyoshi AndoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University Asahikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3500-5488
Mikihiro FujiyaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University Asahikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-7774
Nobuhiro UenoDepartment of General Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital Asahikawa, Japan.
Takahiro ItoInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Sapporo Higashi-Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-4840
Atsuo MaemotoInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Sapporo Higashi-Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Masanao NasunoSapporo IBD Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroki TanakaSapporo IBD Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Kensuke SakuraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takehiko KatsuradaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Fumika OriiInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Toshifumi AshidaInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Satoshi MotoyaIBD Center, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Tomoe KazamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshihiro YokoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Daisuke HirayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi NakaseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Real-world data regarding ustekinumab (UST) for ulcerative colitis (UC) particularly in biologics-naïve patients is currently limited. This study aimed to elucidate the real-world effectiveness and safety of UST for UC. Methods: Overall, 150 patients with UC treated with UST from March 2020 to January 2023 were enrolled across 7 referral hospitals. To assess the clinical efficacy and persistence of UST, retrospective analyses were conducted from weeks 8 to 56. Predictive factors concerning the response and persistence of UST were examined through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Of the 150 patients, 125 received UST for remission induction, including 36% biologics-naïve. The response and remission rates were 72.8% and 56.0% at week 8 and 73.2% and 63.4% at week 56, respectively. Biologics-naïve patients represented higher response and remission rates at week 8 (84.4% and 73.3%) than those with biologics exposure (66.2% and 46.2%). Patients with prior antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and vedolizumab (VDZ) exposure had relatively lower response and remission rates (34.5% and 24.1%, respectively). The 1-year cumulative persistence rate was 84.0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the chronic continuous type and prior anti-TNF and VDZ exposure were negative predictive factors for week 8 responsiveness. Clinical response at week 8 was a predictor of 1-year persistence. Adverse event incidence remained notably low at 6.4%. Conclusions: This study highlights the safety and effectiveness of UST as an induction and maintenance therapy for UC. Chronic continuous type and previous anti-TNF and VDZ exposure negatively contributed to short-term effectiveness, whereas short-term effectiveness provided good persistency.

Indexed as

bio-failurebio-naïvepersistencyulcerative colitisustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID38711858
PMCPMC11071518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.