Soft bioreactor systems: a necessary step toward engineered MSK soft tissue?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Advanced materials and devices strategies of mechanical stimulation for tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026
   Review
2. Humanoid Robotic Loading Enhances Mechanotransduction in Tendon Tissue Engineering.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
   Article
3. Tissue-Engineered Tracheal Reconstruction.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review
4. Mechanobiology in Action: Biomaterials, Devices, and the Cellular Machinery of Force Sensing.Biomolecules · 2025
   Review
5. Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering: From Tissue Regeneration to Biorobotics.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
   Review
6. From Farms to Labs: The New Trend of Sustainable Meat Alternatives.Food science of animal resources · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as