Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Value contribution of blood-based neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in multiple sclerosis using multi-criteria decision analysis.

Enric Monreal, Pilar Díaz Ruiz, Isabel López San Román, Alfredo Rodríguez-Antigüedad, Miguel Ángel Moya-Molina, Ana Álvarez, Elena García-Arcelay, Jorge Maurino, John Shepherd, Álvaro Pérez Cabrera and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Enric MonrealDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple, Red de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Díaz RuizDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.
Isabel López San RománServicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM), Albacete, Spain.
Alfredo Rodríguez-AntigüedadDepartment of Neurology, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Moya-MolinaHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
Ana ÁlvarezRoche Farma, Madrid, Spain.
Elena García-ArcelayRoche Farma, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge MaurinoRoche Farma, Madrid, Spain.
John ShepherdOmakase Consulting, Barcelona, Spain.
Álvaro Pérez CabreraOmakase Consulting, Barcelona, Spain.
Luisa María VillarDepartment of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease that represents a leading cause of non-traumatic disability among young and middle-aged adults. MS is characterized by neurodegeneration caused by axonal injury. Current clinical and radiological markers often lack the sensitivity and specificity required to detect inflammatory activity and neurodegeneration, highlighting the need for better approaches. After neuronal injury, neurofilament light chains (NfL) are released into the cerebrospinal fluid, and eventually into blood. Thus, blood-based NfL could be used as a potential biomarker for inflammatory activity, neurodegeneration, and treatment response in MS. The objective of this study was to determine the value contribution of blood-based NfL as a biomarker in MS in Spain using the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology. Materials and methods: A literature review was performed, and the results were synthesized in the evidence matrix following the criteria included in the MCDA framework. The study was conducted by a multidisciplinary group of six experts. Participants were trained in MCDA and scored the evidence matrix. Results were analyzed and discussed in a group meeting through reflective MCDA discussion methodology. Results: MS was considered a severe condition as it is associated with significant disability. There are unmet needs in MS as a disease, but also in terms of biomarkers since no blood biomarker is available in clinical practice to determine disease activity, prognostic assessment, and response to treatment. The results of the present study suggest that quantification of blood-based NfL may represent a safe option to determine inflammation, neurodegeneration, and response to treatments in clinical practice, as well as to complement data to improve the sensitivity of the diagnosis. Participants considered that blood-based NfL could result in a lower use of expensive tests such as magnetic resonance imaging scans and could provide cost-savings by avoiding ineffective treatments. Lower indirect costs could also be expected due to a lower impact of disability consequences. Overall, blood-based NfL measurement is supported by high-quality evidence. Conclusion: Based on MCDA methodology and the experience of a multidisciplinary group of six stakeholders, blood-based NfL measurement might represent a high-value-option for the management of MS in Spain.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDecision Support TechniquesMultiple SclerosisNeurofilament ProteinsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpainBiomarkersneurofilament protein LNeurofilament Proteinsbiomarkerinflammationmulti-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)multiple sclerosis (MS)neurodegenerationneurofilamentstreatment response

Identifiers

PMID38711771
PMCPMC11073490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.