ArticleCureus2024
Intraoperative Augmented Reality for Complex Glioma Resection: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resection of thoracic meningioma with hoth augmented reality system: technical note and operative video.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that can display three-dimensional patient anatomy in the surgeons' field of view. The use of this technology has grown considerably for both presurgical and intraoperative guidance. A patient diagnosed with breast cancer started to experience numbness in the left hand, which progressed to weakness in the left hand and arm. An MRI was performed demonstrating a 2.9 cm X 1.8 cm lesion with extensive surrounding edema in the posterior fronto-parietal lobes. Surgery was recommended for presumed metastatic disease. Preoperatively, an AR system and Brainlab navigation were registered to the patient. AR, traditional navigation, and ultrasound were all used to localize the lesion and determine the craniotomy site and size. The tumor was removed along the direction of the lesion. Intraoperatively, we used AR to reexamine the tumor details and could appreciate that we had to redirect our surgical trajectory anteriorly and laterally in order to follow along the main axis of the tumor. In doing this, we were able to more confidently remain with the tumor, which by this time was poorly defined by 2D navigation and by direct vision. Postoperative MRI confirmed gross total removal of the tumor. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course with resolution of preoperative symptoms and the final surgical pathology was grade 4 glioblastoma. Here, we describe the valuable use of AR for the resection of a glioma. The system has a seamless registration process and provides the surgeon with a unique view of 3D anatomy overlaid onto the patient's head. This exciting technology can add tremendous value to complex cranial surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.