Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711710›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Comprehensive Review of Proximal Humerus Fractures: From Epidemiology to Treatment Strategies.

Saksham Goyal, Ratnakar Ambade, Rahul Singh, Ashutosh Lohiya, Hardik Patel, Siddharth K Patel, Kashyap Kanani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saksham GoyalOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Ratnakar AmbadeOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Rahul SinghOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Ashutosh LohiyaOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Hardik PatelOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Siddharth K PatelOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Kashyap KananiOrthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive review delves into the intricate landscape of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), exploring their epidemiology, historical evolution, contemporary classification systems, treatment strategies, and outcome measures. PHFs present a complex orthopedic challenge, necessitating a nuanced understanding of their multifaceted dimensions. Despite their clinical significance, PHFs remain relatively understudied in population-based epidemiology. This review critically examines existing literature to uncover the incidence, prevalence, and demographic patterns associated with these fractures. A foundational understanding of the epidemiological landscape is crucial for effective preventive strategies and optimized fracture management. Tracing back to historical records, the review explores the evolution of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for PHFs. From ancient treatment modalities documented on the Edwin Smith papyrus to contemporary X-ray-based classifications such as Neer and AO/OTA, a historical context is provided to understand the journey of managing these fractures. Navigating through a spectrum of treatment strategies, the review contrasts nonoperative approaches with various surgical interventions. The challenges and outcomes associated with conservative management are juxtaposed against methods like open reduction internal fixation and tension band osteosynthesis. Evidence synthesis guides clinicians in making informed decisions based on patient characteristics and fracture complexities. Central to assessing PHF management are patient-reported outcome measures. The review explores the significance of instruments such as the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Constant-Murley score in evaluating treatment success. The shift toward subjective measures is discussed, considering their correlation with patient experiences and the concept of minimal clinically important difference. The impact of demographic factors, including age and gender, on PHFs is scrutinized. The association between these fractures and osteoporosis is highlighted, emphasizing the crucial role of bone health in fracture prevention and management. Through this comprehensive exploration, the review provides a robust foundation for understanding, evaluating, and advancing the management strategies for PHFs. The synthesis of historical perspectives, contemporary classifications, and treatment modalities serves as a valuable resource for the orthopedic community, fostering improved clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

classificationimagingproximal humerus fracturesscorestreatment

Identifiers

PMID38711710
PMCPMC11070885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.