Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711615›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2024

Chasing Graphene-Based Anticancer Drugs: Where are We Now on the Biomedical Graphene Roadmap?

Katarzyna Uzdrowska, Narcyz Knap, Jacek Gulczynski, Alicja Kuban-Jankowska, Wiktoria Struck-Lewicka, Michal J Markuszewski, Tomasz Bączek, Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska, Magdalena Gorska-Ponikowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katarzyna UzdrowskaDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-211, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3291-7852
Narcyz KnapDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-211, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6162-3987
Jacek GulczynskiFaculty of Health Sciences with the Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-211, Poland.
Alicja Kuban-JankowskaDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-211, Poland.
Wiktoria Struck-LewickaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-416, Poland.
Michal J MarkuszewskiFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-416, Poland.
Tomasz BączekFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-416, Poland.
Ewa Izycka-SwieszewskaFaculty of Health Sciences with the Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-211, Poland.
Magdalena Gorska-PonikowskaDepartment of Medical Chemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 80-211, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene and graphene-based materials have attracted growing interest for potential applications in medicine because of their good biocompatibility, cargo capability and possible surface functionalizations. In parallel, prototypic graphene-based devices have been developed to diagnose, imaging and track tumor growth in cancer patients. There is a growing number of reports on the use of graphene and its functionalized derivatives in the design of innovative drugs delivery systems, photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy, and as a platform to combine multiple therapies. The aim of this review is to introduce the latest scientific achievements in the field of innovative composite graphene materials as potentially applied in cancer therapy. The "Technology and Innovation Roadmap" published in the Graphene Flagship indicates, that the first anti-cancer drugs using graphene and graphene-derived materials will have appeared on the market by 2030. However, it is necessary to broaden understanding of graphene-based material interactions with cellular metabolism and signaling at the functional level, as well as toxicity. The main aspects of further research should elucidate how treatment methods (e.g., photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, combination therapy) and the physicochemical properties of graphene materials influence their ability to modulate autophagy and kill cancer cells. Interestingly, recent scientific reports also prove that graphene nanocomposites modulate cancer cell death by inducing precise autophagy dysfunctions caused by lysosome damage. It turns out as well that developing photothermal oncological treatments, it should be taken into account that near-infrared-II radiation (1000-1500 nm) is a better option than NIR-I (750-1000 nm) because it can penetrate deeper into tissues due to less scattering at longer wavelengths radiation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsGraphiteNeoplasmsAnimalsAutophagyDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanocompositesNanomedicinePhotochemotherapyAntineoplastic AgentsGraphitebiomedical innovationscancer treatmentdrugs delivery systemsgraphene-based materialsoncological therapies

Identifiers

PMID38711615
PMCPMC11073537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.