ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Predicting TCR sequences for unseen antigen epitopes using structural and sequence features.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling TCR-Epitope Recognition Specificity: What We Should Learn to Succeed.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Decoding adaptive immunity: advanced strategies in T and B cell repertoire analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- TCR representation learning with protein language models: a comprehensive review.International immunology · 2026Review
- Computational Methods for Cancer Neoantigen Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Disrupting explicit encoding paradigms: property-interactive transformers decode T-cell receptor specificity beyond dataset biases.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- TCRdesign: an antigen-specific generative language model for de novo design of T-cell receptors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Computation strategies and clinical applications in neoantigen discovery towards precision cancer immunotherapy.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Computational methods and data resources for predicting tumor neoantigens.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- STAG-LLM: Predicting TCR-pHLA binding with protein language models and computationally generated 3D structures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Assessing the generalization capabilities of TCR binding predictors via peptide distance analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Advances of computational methods enhance the development of multi-epitope vaccines.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- tcrBLOSUM: an amino acid substitution matrix for sensitive alignment of distant epitope-specific TCRs.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- epiTCR-KDA: knowledge distillation model on dihedral angles for TCR-peptide prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition of antigens is fundamental to the adaptive immune response. With the expansion of experimental techniques, a substantial database of matched TCR-antigen pairs has emerged, presenting opportunities for computational prediction models. However, accurately forecasting the binding affinities of unseen antigen-TCR pairs remains a major challenge. Here, we present convolutional-self-attention TCR (CATCR), a novel framework tailored to enhance the prediction of epitope and TCR interactions. Our approach utilizes convolutional neural networks to extract peptide features from residue contact matrices, as generated by OpenFold, and a transformer to encode segment-based coded sequences. We introduce CATCR-D, a discriminator that can assess binding by analyzing the structural and sequence features of epitopes and CDR3-β regions. Additionally, the framework comprises CATCR-G, a generative module designed for CDR3-β sequences, which applies the pretrained encoder to deduce epitope characteristics and a transformer decoder for predicting matching CDR3-β sequences. CATCR-D achieved an AUROC of 0.89 on previously unseen epitope-TCR pairs and outperformed four benchmark models by a margin of 17.4%. CATCR-G has demonstrated high precision, recall and F1 scores, surpassing 95% in bidirectional encoder representations from transformers score assessments. Our results indicate that CATCR is an effective tool for predicting unseen epitope-TCR interactions. Incorporating structural insights enhances our understanding of the general rules governing TCR-epitope recognition significantly. The ability to predict TCRs for novel epitopes using structural and sequence information is promising, and broadening the repository of experimental TCR-epitope data could further improve the precision of epitope-TCR binding predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.