Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38711370›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Towards multi-omics synthetic data integration.

Kumar Selvarajoo, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kumar SelvarajooBiomolecular Sequence to Function Division, BII, (A*STAR), Singapore, 138671, Republic of Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-9666
Sebastian Maurer-StrohBiomolecular Sequence to Function Division, BII, (A*STAR), Singapore, 138671, Republic of Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across many scientific disciplines, the development of computational models and algorithms for generating artificial or synthetic data is gaining momentum. In biology, there is a great opportunity to explore this further as more and more big data at multi-omics level are generated recently. In this opinion, we discuss the latest trends in biological applications based on process-driven and data-driven aspects. Moving ahead, we believe these methodologies can help shape novel multi-omics-scale cellular inferences.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyBig DataGenomicsHumansMultiomicsProteomicsdata-drivenmachine learningmulti-omicsprocess-drivensynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID38711370
PMCPMC11074586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.